Defendant

A Imprisonment for two years, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 30, 2015, Defendant A sentenced ten months to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Seoul Northern District Court (Seoul Northern District Court) on March 3, 2016, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Ansan Prison.

On March 22, 2016, around 15:30 on March 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) opened and intruded a large 'large 'the entrance door of the victim F in Mapo-gu Seoul E-4' in the entrance gate; (b) stolen cash amounting to KRW 450,000,000 from March 22, 2016 to April 30, 2016, the Defendant stolen the cash amounting to KRW 13,82,400,00, which is the victim's ownership, and KRW 50,000,000, which is the cash amounting to approximately KRW 4.50,000,000 from March 22, 2016 to April 30, 2016.

2. Defendant B is a person engaged in sales of precious metals with the trade name named “H” in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G. A.

On April 5, 2016, at around 17:35, the Defendant purchased three gold 14 k gold girs, which he stolen from A from the above exchange.

In such cases, the defendant, who is engaged in sales of precious metals, has a duty of care to verify whether he/she is stolen by ascertaining A's personal information, etc., while demanding details of acquisition, registration of sale, and price suitable for transaction prices.

Nevertheless, as the Defendant neglected such care and neglected the judgment on the stolen goods, the Defendant purchased three gold 14k gold stuffs from A by negligence in the course of business and acquired the stolen goods in KRW 300,000,000.

B. On April 19, 2016, the Defendant purchased one net gold 180,000 won at the market price that he stolen from A from the foregoing exchange and one gold tamping equivalent to 1.8 million won at the market price, one, 14k gold tamp, and 14k gold tamp.

In such a case, the defendant will be the defendant.

The duty of care, such as Paragraph (1), was neglected.