logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2016.01.15 2015고단1156
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 4, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 500,000 won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and a fine of 1 million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Chuncheon District Court on September 7, 2012, respectively.

On November 15, 2015, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle with C low alcohol level of about 1km from the upper corner of the Dozin, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, to the uppermost, while under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.105% in the blood.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on driving alcohol;

1. Previous conviction: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries about criminal history, investigation reports (Attachment of a copy of a summary order), and summary order;

1. Article 148-2 of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, the selection of a fine, and the selection of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. There is no criminal record exceeding the fine imposed on the defendant for the reason of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in the order of provisional payment; the degree of punishment for the previous criminal record; the time range discovered by the driving of drinking including the instant case; the age of the defendant; his age; sexual conduct; family relationship; etc., the punishment shall be determined by taking into account the various sentencing conditions stated in the argument of the instant case

arrow