Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7 million.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who served as the research right for appointment and research of the F Council, an incorporated association, from August 20, 2008 to April 20, 2010, and Defendant B is a person who served as the head of the F Council Evaluation Support Department from May 23, 2008 to January 31, 2009.

1. The Defendants committed the joint crime - the fraud Defendants planned by the F Council to take charge of the duties such as the approval of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, and the designation of evaluation committee members related to “G projects” and the request and disbursement of project costs, etc.

However, when the Defendants thought that the remuneration paid to the evaluation committee members participating in the above project is less in light of their social status, etc., the Defendants concluded a research service contract with the evaluation committee members for the purpose of receiving a certain amount of money on their own as their own allowance, and conspired to receive the payment of the said remuneration by pretending that the research service contract with the “H” was concluded with the evaluation committee members with the aim of receiving a certain amount of money on their own.

On November 26, 2008, at the F Council on the 11st floor of the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I building, Defendants entered into a service contract with the evaluation committee members of the above project to receive national subsidies under the pretext of research service expenses, and received internal resolution from the Secretary-General of the F Council as if they were to carry out such contract.

After that, Defendant B instructed Defendant A to receive KRW 140 million from the management support division (current management support team), the accounting department of the F Council, using the above internal approval documents, as research service costs. Defendant A around January 19, 2009 and around January 20, 2009, to the J, an employee in charge of the above internal approval documents, together with the above internal approval documents, and a research service agreement with the other six other K and six persons.