The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that “B or C forged Defendant’s signature to the Busan District Court on January 25, 2017, and thus punished for shipping the minutes of the general meeting on February 17, 2016, the Defendant submitted a complaint to the public service offices of the branch office of the Busan District Public Prosecutor’s Office to the public service offices of the branch office of the Busan District Public Prosecutor’s Office on May 12, 2017, and on June 23, 2017, the Defendant appeared at the investigation department of the Busan Southern District Public Prosecutor’s Office on February 17, 2016, and the list of the participants of the meeting attached to the minutes of the general meeting on February 17, 2016, was signed by the Defendant on the signature book related to the Busan District Public Prosecutor’s signature, but B or C signed the above signature on February 17, 2016 by attaching the minutes of the general meeting as if he was the participants of the general meeting.

“Supplementary statement to the effect that the complaint was filed.”

However, in fact, the signature signature book related to the signature movement of 10 million Busan X-ray is separate from the list of participants attached to the meeting minutes of the meeting of the meeting of the center for senior citizens belonging to the D organization established on February 17, 2016 and the defendant was directly signed on the above signature book and the above list of participants, so there was no fact that B and C submitted the above signature book to the court as if they were the above list of participants.

Accordingly, the defendant did not appeal B and C.

2. Determination

A. The record reveals the following facts.

(1) The Suwon-gu Branch of the Association of Busan Metropolitan City (Chapter B) of D, a incorporated association, has a center for older persons under its jurisdiction, and C was registered as the Chairperson of the E center for older persons on February 22, 2016.

② On July 17, 2016, the Defendant, a member of the Elderly Party, filed a lawsuit against the above Suwon-gu Branch to verify that C was not in the position of the Chairperson of the Elderly Party. The above Suwon-gu Branch, asserting that “C had a legitimate general meeting resolution passed at the general meeting meeting to be elected as the Chairperson of the Center for Senior Citizens,” submitted to the court the minutes of the general meeting and the list of the participants of the meeting on February 17, 2016.

③ On the other hand, according to evidence, the court has signed the above list of the members present at the meeting.