logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2020.06.12 2019나25815
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The ground for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance is not significantly different from the argument in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified even if each evidence submitted to the court of first instance was presented to this court.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows: “(Defendant’s investment obligation)” in the third 4th tier of the judgment of the court of first instance is “(Plaintiff’s investment obligation)”; “(Plaintiff’s asset management obligation)” in the third 5th tier “(Defendant’s asset management obligation)”; “(Defendant’s asset management obligation)” in the third 9 class “(Plaintiff B’s distribution obligation)” in the third 9 class “(Defendant’s distribution obligation)”; and “the Plaintiff received money from the Plaintiff” in the seventh 8th tier “the Plaintiff received money” in the second 8th tier, and thus, it is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow