Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Punishment of the crime

At around 03:50 on December 15, 2014, the Defendants conspired with C and D, and at the main point of "F" located in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul. On December 15, 2014, the Defendants obstructed police officers’ legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders by committing assaulting the Defendants’ daily behaviors by the police officers and I, who were called out after receiving 112 reports from the police officers belonging to the Seoul Yongsan-gu Seoul Yongsan Police Station G police box, and Defendant A attempted to arrest the Defendants as flagrant offenders. Defendant B, on their hand, by committing assaulting the police officers I’s bridges beyond the upper floor to kill the police officers, thereby hindering the police officers’ legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s partial statement, Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against J, C, or D;

1. Application of each police protocol to H and I;

1. Defendants: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; Selection of fines

1. Defendants in the custody of a workhouse: Defendant A’s assertion as to the assertion of Defendant A under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is alleged to the effect that he was in a state of mental disorder because he was under the influence of alcohol at the time of the crime, and was in a state of mental disorder.

According to the records, although the defendant's drinking at the time of the above crime is recognized, it cannot be seen that the defendant's ability to discern things or make decisions has been weak or lost. Thus, the defendant's assertion is rejected.

The reasons for sentencing are generally led to the confession of the crime, and the degree of the assault of this case is not serious, and the crime of this case seems to have resulted in contingently in the crime of this case under the influence of alcohol, and other factors such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and circumstances after the crime are considered, the punishment shall be determined as per the order.