Text
1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff, but Defendant B is within the scope of the property inherited from the network C, and on 194.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. 1) The Plaintiff entered into a credit guarantee agreement on July 26, 2016, as Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant A”).
between Defendant A and Defendant D, Inc. (hereinafter “D”).
The following table shall apply to the principal and interest of loan to be borne in receiving loans from them:
1. After entering into a credit guarantee agreement, such as the details of the guarantee (hereinafter referred to as the “credit guarantee agreement of this case”), the letter of credit guarantee was issued in D, and the defendant A issued the following table:
2. A loan has been granted according to the details of the loan;
Serial No. 1 E 202,800,000 of the guaranteed term loan subject on the date of guarantee of the guaranteed term, and on July 26, 2016, the list of loans for corporate purchase on July 25, 2018.
1. Details of guarantee (unit: Table of won);
2. The loan details: (a) on July 26, 2016, 1 E 202,80,000,000 the loan date of the loan extended by the guarantee number lending institution (handling store) and (b) on July 29, 2016, C, which was the representative director of the Defendant A, guaranteed the Defendant A’s obligation to the Plaintiff under the instant credit guarantee agreement. (b) The occurrence of the credit guarantee accident and the Plaintiff’s subrogation; (b) on April 11, 2018, the credit guarantee accident due to delinquency of the loan (hereinafter “the instant credit guarantee accident”); and (c) on June 29, 2018, the Plaintiff on June 29, 2015, 195,108,810 won (i.e., principal, 191, 198, 190, 300, 936, 198, 306, 198
2) According to the Credit Guarantee Fund Act and the Credit Guarantee Agreement, when the Plaintiff fulfilled the guaranteed obligation, the Plaintiff shall be paid 10% (the Plaintiff’s fixed rate due to the autonomy rate) per annum from the date of performance to the date of full payment. 3) The Plaintiff appropriated 201,610 won recovered from Defendant A on June 29, 2018 to the repayment of the principal of subrogated principal, thereby 194,907,205 won (i.e., 195,108,815 - 201,610 won). The remainder of subrogated amount was 55 won = 201,610 x 0.1 x 0.1.