logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.09.29 2016누38909
시정명령및과징금납부명령취소
Text

1. Attached Table 1(3) written by the Defendant against the Plaintiff as Decision No. 2016-050, Feb. 15, 2016.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The status of three companies, including the Plaintiff, etc., the Plaintiff Co., Ltd., and Korea Industrial Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Co., Ltd.”), omitted, and the combination of them is a business entity under Article 2 subparag. 1 of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act (hereinafter referred to as “Fair Trade Act”), which is a person engaged in construction business.

Among the procedures and the current status of the tender tender for the construction and tecolpool and the tender for the second construction, and the sewage treatment facilities for the final wastewater treatment facilities in the local industrial complex in the achievement2, there are various kinds of polluted materials, such as oil, nitrogen, human resource, and fractum, among the sewage treatment facilities in the final wastewater treatment facilities in the local industrial complex. Among this, nitrogen and arbitr among them, it is a total human treatment facility that removes easy persons to process chemicals among them.

The construction work (hereinafter referred to as "mar and achievement 2 construction work") is a construction work to treat factory wastewater and daily sewage generated in the Sungmun-gu, Daegu Metropolitan City and the second local industrial complex. On March 31, 2011, the Public Procurement Service, which is the ordering person, constituted each joint supply and demand organization on April 11, 201, as listed below, and submitted a preliminary examination of participation in bidding (P Q, Pregu) document on April 11, 201, and tender was made on June 16, 201.

As a result of the bid for the representative company, the joint contractor of the plaintiff was finally determined as the successful bidder on July 20, 201, as follows: the plaintiff (50), the plaintiff (30), the Han Industrial Development (10), the Taiwan (10), the letter (60), the letter (10), and the Tae Young Construction (40).

The estimated amount of 16,99,00,000 won (including value-added tax) for the design evaluation (60 points) of bidders' bid price (100 points) in total (100 points) for non-fixed bid price (100 points) and for the 2nd project to be achieved.

Plaintiff

16,140,300 94.26 40 54.26 40 94.26 94.26 16,480,280 96.95 45.26 39.1748 84.4348 is on the one hand.

arrow