beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On December 14, 2010, the Public Procurement Service publicly announced the tender of the instant construction project to “construction works for treatment facilities, which are a total sewage treatment plant,” which is the main sewage treatment plant,” (hereinafter “instant construction works”).
The instant construction project is a package design and construction project with the estimated construction cost of KRW 92,265,00,000, and the bid method is “the standard method (60% of the design score and 40% of the price score)”. According to this, among the design eligible persons whose design score is at least 80 points, the bidder who acquired the highest score by adding design weight points and price weight points to the design eligible persons whose design score is at least 80 points is determined as the successful bidder.
B. In addition to the Plaintiff’s agreement and bid for the instant construction project, Hyundai Construction Co., Ltd., gold industry Co., Ltd., and Copi global Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Co., Ltd.”), the Plaintiff, etc. organized a joint supply and demand organization and participated in the bidding as a representative. On February 14, 2011, the day before the closing date of tender, the employees of the Plaintiff, etc. agreed to participate in the bidding at the corresponding ratio as indicated in the “the bid ratio for the estimated construction cost” column.
In addition, on March 3, 201, according to the actual agreement rate of bid, the following table "tender amount" was reflected at the closing date of tender.
The 60 points for the separate design and evaluation (60 points) price x (135,066.44.44% 56.81.74 Hyundai Construction 87,088,933 94.39.39% 51.393 939.8391391.8 91.8 91.81.83% of the 87.03,574.33% 574.3% 574.3% of 574.3% of 574.3% of 56.3% of 56.26979.26.976.23,982,82,984.289.4.105% of the bid price and the bid price were selected as the bid bidder of this case, as the bid bidder of this case.
Accordingly, on July 4, 2011, the Public Procurement Service rendered a contract with the Plaintiff on July 4, 201, with the amount invested. 87,135,06.