A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 21:00 on June 15, 2015, the Defendant, while drinking alcohol in the restaurant of the name “D” located in Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, in order to avoid disturbance and to attempt to go back to the above police officers by gathering the humf belonging to the Goyang Police Station E zone of the Goyangyang Police Station E zone and the slope G to have the Defendant return to the site after being reported 112.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Application of H’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. Consideration, such as the fact that the defendant under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act is aged, that his mistake is remarkably divided, that there is no record of punishment heavier than the fine, and that there does not come to actual violent events;