The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (ten months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and two hundred hours of community service order) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. A favorable circumstance is that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflected the mistake.

However, the act of lending the means of access, such as the instant crime, is highly likely to be used for the crime of Bosing, etc., and thus there is a high possibility of using the means of access to the crime of fraud, actual damage has occurred due to the use of the means of access leased by the Defendant for the crime of fraud, and the Defendant committed again the instant crime during the suspension period of execution due

In full view of such circumstances as well as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances after the commission of the crime, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared to the original judgment, and there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared to the original judgment, the lower court’s sentence cannot be deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable for the lower court to have imposed the Defendant.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.