1. The Defendant’s KRW 7,001,50 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from March 11, 2017 to March 14, 2018.

1. Details, etc. of ruling;

(a) Project approval and public notice - Project name: B housing redevelopment rearrangement project - Project implementer: Defendant - Public notice of project implementation authorization: Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on June 24, 2009;

(b) The adjudication of expropriation made on January 20, 2017 by the local land expropriation committee of the Seoul Metropolitan City: The Plaintiff’s share of 1/4 square meter of 109.1 square meter of Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant land”) and the instant housing, etc. on the instant land (the Plaintiff shall not file a claim for the increase of compensation for the foregoing obstacles): The starting date of expropriation: March 10, 2017 - the adjudication of expropriation of the instant land: 131,683,70 won - the appraisal corporation: the appraisal corporation which was a new appraisal company, and the third appraisal corporation of the resolution of the resolution of the resolution of expropriation.

(c) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on July 20, 2017 - Compensation for losses on the objection to the instant land: 132,973,800 won - An appraisal corporation: a certified public appraisal corporation and a general appraisal corporation and a general appraisal corporation.

D. The court appraiser E’s appraisal results (hereinafter the above appraiser’s appraiser’s “court appraisal” and the above appraisal “court appraisal”) selected as a comparative standard a size of 109.1 square meters (specific use area: Class 2 general use area, specific use area: a Class-II general use area: a Class-II general use area, road traffic: a small slope: a small slope: a small slope: a small slope) and conducted time adjustment and compared the regional factors and individual factors of the instant land. Based on the example of the appraisal on the land in Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu, Seoul, the appraisal value of the instant land was calculated on the basis of other corrective factors.

[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap evidence 1 to 4, Gap evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 1 to 4, the court's appraisal result, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s legitimate compensation for losses on the instant land is claimed for the difference between the appraised value based on the result of the court’s appraisal and the compensation for losses on the instant land, and for the payment of KRW 7,001,50 and the compensation for losses on delay.

B. Determination 1 on the increase or decrease of land expropriation compensation.