logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.02.15 2016고정1184
상해
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A’s injured Defendant: (a) knew of the fact that the sales contract was made on the part of the victim B (57 years old); (b) around 13:45 on October 29, 2016, Defendant A asked the victim B (57 years old) of the window C at Changwon-si’s window C (57 years old) to inform the victim of the date and time of double contract and the other party’s information.

However, the victim's refusal to do so while making the victim, and at the same time, the defendant changed from the office.

In this regard, the defendant who has interested in the defect is at the close of the victim's face.

Scars also accused.

In the words of “sponsing the victim’s face.”

The victim spits the face of the defendant by spiting the victim in his face and spiting him with smelling the Defendant's snack. The defendant spits the face of the victim two times, blicking the victim's face, blicking the victim's face and blicking the victim's face for 14 days.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article, asked the Defendant to inform the owner of commercial buildings of the date and time of double contract and the other party’s information, but the Defendant refused this request, and at the same time, changed from the office to the victim.

In this regard, a person interested in the defect spits the victim's face, spits the victim's face, spits the victim's clothes, and assaults the victim's face.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect against the defendant B;

1. Although Defendant A asserts that there is no injury diagnosis report (22 pages of investigation records), Defendant A’s assertion on the occurrence report (injury, etc.), Defendant A’s assertion that there is no injury in drinking the victim B, the following facts are acknowledged by the evidence in its holding:

arrow