logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.12.18 2016고정3091
폭행
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

Defendant A is a taxi driver who operates C vehicle, and the victim D is a driver of E vehicle.

On July 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 23:00 on July 21, 2016, the vehicles operated by the victim D prior to the establishment of the Suwon-Eup and the Republic of Korea National University led to the right-hand transfer; (b) the vehicle was in front of the establishment of the Suwon-do University, and became a threat to the victim’s vehicle by operating the taxi.

After that, the victim discovered a taxi of the defendant who is an illegal intern in front of the water sources and applied for the defendant to get the driver's seat glass, and used the defendant to see that "working is immediately lower", and the defendant who caused the defect was assaulted in a way that the victim took a bath to the victim, and used the chest part of the victim's chest by the two hand.

Dismissal of Public Prosecution

(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Submission of a written confirmation to the effect that the victim’s punishment is not permissible on October 17, 2017 after institution of the prosecution;

(c) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow