beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three years and six months.
An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On July 24, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Seoul Central District Court on July 24, 2008 and completed the execution of the sentence in a medical prison on September 2, 201.
【Criminal Facts】
"2012 Highest 2819"
1. Around 12:00 on August 23, 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the F mobile phone agent of the victim E operation of Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul (Seoul) with the victim’s first floor A52 underground floor A52, the Defendant laid down two mobile phone machines with two galle lusium equipment equivalent to KRW 994,00,000 at the market price owned by the victim.
2. At around 13:00 on August 24, 2012, the Defendant: (a) took advantage of the gaps in which the surveillance of the victim was neglected; and (b) took advantage of two gallon-based mobile phone machines equivalent to 994,000 won in the market price owned by the victim; and (c) stolen the victim.
"2012 Highest 2990"
1. On May 2, 2012, the Defendant, at the “I” office for the suspect’s operation of the fourth 308 floor of the H-building in Gangnam-gu Seoul, to lease KRW 1.5 million to the five North Korea of Samsung C, the market value of which is equivalent to KRW 1.5 million owned by the victim C for three months, and, in other words, to receive five North Korea units from the tin, did not refund the rent unpaid and the victim claimed the termination of the contract and the return thereof on June 12, 2012.
Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the victim's property.
2. Fraud;
A. On October 13, 2012, around 19:30 on October 13, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim at the victim’s direct management agency of Seodaemun-gu 1 LG Ulus, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul where the Victim JJ serves as the victim that “I will make a mobile phone gift to Chok, while the name of the mobile phone is friendly L, and pay a fee within.”
However, in fact, even if the mobile phone opened and received the mobile phone, there was no intention or ability to pay the price normally, since there was an idea to prepare the money by selling it.
The defendant is against the victim.