(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2019.10.23 2019고단3294

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2019.10.23 2019고단3294

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The false statement of the victim’s identity, as an employee of the so-called “phishing,” the victim led the victims to deliver the so-called physical value to the Defendant, etc. as if the victims were captured, and the Defendant, etc. conspiredd to commit the crime of the phishing fraud by receiving the money from the victims in accordance with the direction of the victim who was unable to obtain the money from the victims.

On August 26, 2019, at least 09:30 on the French land, the person whose name was omitted refers to the purpose of acquiring money by means of the crime of Bophishing, and the defendant was forced the victim to deliver 6.8 million won in cash in front of the Dsung in the city of the Government of the Republic of Korea at around 15:00 on the same day to the defendant, and the defendant received the above money from the victim in accordance with the direction of the person who was unable to obtain his name, by hiding his name to the effect that "I would like to safely return his/her bond guarantee. I would like to get his/her wife back. I would like to do so. I would like to get his/her wife to safely return his/her bond guarantee. I would like to get the victim to do so."

Accordingly, the defendant was given money by deceiving the victim in collusion with the name of the handicapped.

2. The Defendant, etc. attempted to commit fraud in order to acquire money from an unspecified number of victims through the above method.

On August 27, 2019, the name-in-factist was only the purpose of acquiring money through the crime of Bosphishing, and even though he did not have captured the children of the victim E, and called the victim to the effect that "the friend guaranteed 50 million won by mistake of friend and friend," and that "the friend of friend and friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend frith frith frith frith frith frith frith frith frith frith frith frith frith frith frith frith frith frith

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2020.04.03 2019고단4103

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2019.12.18 2019고단3928

-의정부지방법원 2019.11.01 2019고단3469

-서울서부지방법원 2017.11.28 2017고단2760

-서울서부지방법원 2019.08.14 2019고단1815