logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원목포지원 2015.09.24 2014가합11951
보험에관한 소송
Text

1. The insurance contract entered in the separate sheet concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant A is invalid.

2. The defendant B.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On May 15, 2009, Defendant A entered into an insurance contract on the attached list with the Green Damage Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Green Damage Insurance”) with the insured and the beneficiary as Defendant B, his father (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

On May 3, 2013, the Plaintiff was transferred the status of the insurance contract for green damage insurance by the ruling of the Financial Services Commission.

B. Defendant B asserted that, on August 25, 2009, the number of days of hospitalization indicated in Table 1 No. 25 is 471 days in total 30 times until August 8, 2014, as indicated in Table 1, the Plaintiff claimed that, as indicated in Table 1, the number of days of hospitalization indicated in Table 25 is “2 days” and the total number of days of hospitalization is “476 days”.

In the meantime, the hospital was hospitalized and received insurance money of KRW 18,570,000 from the Plaintiff or Green Damage Insurance in relation to the above hospitalization.

1. Table 1: Defendant B’s hospital beyond 1. The number of days of diagnosis and release from the bones of 2. 5 on August 25, 2009, such as 1. The number of days of hospitalization from Defendant B’s hospital (including 1.5 f., f., e., e., g., f., f., f., e., f., f., e., e., g., e., f., f. e., g., f., e., g., e., g., f., 200, f., f. e., e., e., g., 2000 and f., f., e., e., g., e., e., e., g., e., 1500, g. e. e., 150000.

arrow