logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.06.18 2013고단1037
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 1, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 700,000 won for the violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Sung-nam branch of Suwon District Court on December 1, 2006, and one year of imprisonment for the violation of the Road Traffic Act and two years of suspended execution for the previous district court on February 10, 2009.

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On April 12, 2013, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol of 0.201% with a blood alcohol concentration of 06:30%, and led to the driving of the said car at the 1812-1st head of Sinri-si, Sinriri-si from the kingn Station to the Sinri-si, Sinri-si.

A person engaged in driving service shall not drive in a state where normal driving is difficult under the influence of alcohol, and since a signal, etc. is installed therein, there was a duty of care to drive safely in accordance with the signals by reducing speed and by properly examining the right and the right and the right.

Nevertheless, the victim C (the 40-year-old) who proceeded to Ansan from the side of the D Bus driven by the Silified Authority by negligence, disregarding that the vehicle signal is a stop signal while under the influence of alcohol while it is difficult to drive in a normal condition, suffered from the front part of the D Bus operated by the victim C (the 40-year-old) in front part of the said D Bus, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the above C, and the victim E (the 65-year-old) who boarded the bus, in need of approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim E (the 65-year-old).

Accordingly, the defendant, who violated the drinking driving two times or more, was driving under the influence of drinking, and led to the injury of people by driving a motor vehicle while it is difficult to drive a motor vehicle normally due to influence of drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. The actual condition survey report, on-site photographs, traffic accident occurrence report, vehicle photographs, and the circumstantial report of the driver concerned, respectively;

arrow