1. As to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 280,811,922, Plaintiff B’s KRW 280,779,922, and each of the said money from October 19, 2019.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) D is a vehicle E in freight around 17:10 on October 19, 2019 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

) During the course of driving the F driver’s Gboard of the Gboard of the F driver’s G, who was directly located on the right side from the left side of the running direction to the cross-road of the 2740-Gu 12-dong, Sinri-si, Sinri-si, Sinri-si, the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) On November 3, 2019, F, due to the instant accident, died of cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral Sponsor.

(F) The Defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the Defendant’s vehicle. (4) The Plaintiffs are the parents of the Deceased.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap’s 1 through 4, 9 through 12, and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the recognition of liability and the recognition of the above limitation, as the deceased died due to the operation of the Defendant’s vehicle, the Defendant, as the insurer of the Defendant’s vehicle, is liable to compensate the deceased and the plaintiffs for the damages caused by the instant accident.

As to the limitation of liability, the defendant's liability is not limited because there is a lack of assertion or evidence to acknowledge the deceased's negligence.

2. In addition to the matters stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each of the corresponding items of the Schedule of Calculation of Compensation for Damages shall be as follows, and in principle, the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated monthly, but less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.

[Ground of recognition] without any dispute, entry of Gap 2, 4, 6, and 15, and this court's judgment against H.