A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Evidence Nos. 38, 39, 41, No. 44, No. 45, to the victim B.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2019. 3. 12. 18:33경 서울 강남구 D에 있는 E 압구정본점 지하1층의 식품관 내에서, 피해자 F이 제품을 살펴보는 사이에, 피해자의 쇼핑카트 위에 있던, 그 소유의 검정색 ‘샤넬’ 지갑, ‘베르사체’ 선글라스, 갤럭시 노트4 휴대폰, ‘에르메스’ 손수건 각 1개 및 G 상품권, 현금 15만 원 등이 들어있는 검정색 ‘샤넬’ 핸드백 등 합계 420만 원 상당의 재물을 들고 간 것을 비롯하여, 그때부터 2019. 3. 19. 18:11경까지 사이에 별지 범죄일람표 기재와 같이 총 6회에 걸쳐 피해자들 소유의 합계 3,670만 원 상당의 재물을 절취하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of H, I, J, B, and C;

1. Each protocol of seizure, each list of seizure, and each photograph of seized articles;

1. Reports on each occurrence of a theft;

1. Report on internal investigation (the other party to the victim's internal investigation and CCTV image verification at the scene of occurrence), report on internal investigation (the verification of CCTV image at the scene of occurrence), report on internal investigation (on-site investigation, etc.), re-report on internal investigation (on-site investigation and CCTV image verification), report on internal investigation (the verification of the shape of crime), and closure of each CCTV;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (the confirmation of a victim with respect to any confiscated article), investigation reports (the hearing reports of the victim), investigation reports (the hearing reports of the victim), and investigation reports (the re-specific reports on

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 333(1) of the Return Criminal Procedure Act [No evidence Nos. 38, 39, 41, according to the records] is reasonable to deem that the victim Eul and No. 44, and 45 are stolen goods. As such, a return order shall be issued to the above victims as ordered by the disposition. As other seized articles not temporarily returned are not included in the facts charged or their ownership relationship is unclear, the return order shall not be issued. Thus, the reason for sentencing is that the return is not ordered.]

1. The scope of punishment by law: