logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.12.04 2018나41220
잔여퇴직금청구
Text

1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

3. The total cost of the lawsuit.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The party status 1) The Plaintiff B (hereinafter “instant savings bank”)

2) On January 14, 2011, the savings bank of this case was declared bankrupt by the Seoul Central District Court No. 201Hau72 on June 24, 201, and the Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation was appointed as a trustee in bankruptcy.

(B) The Plaintiff, from July 15, 2003 to August 18, 2008, worked as the personnel management director of the savings bank of this case and as an accounting director from August 19, 2008, and retired on January 14, 2011. (b) The Defendant trustee in bankruptcy established the savings bank of this case from February 7, 2011 to July 29, 201, in violation of the Mutual Savings Banks Act, the standard loan regulations of mutual savings banks, etc., and conducted an investigation into the insolvency liability against the employees of the savings bank of this case. The Plaintiff was indicted as a violation of the Act on External Audit of the Plaintiff and its employees, and was sentenced to the Seoul High Court Decision 201Da271381 decided on December 19, 201 (Seoul High Court Decision 201Da3714 decided on December 27, 201). The Plaintiff was also convicted on the retirement pension of this case and its employees.

arrow