(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.07.22 2015고단972

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.07.22 2015고단972

업무방해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On October 24, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with labor for the crime of interference with business, etc. at the Busan District Court’s Branch Branch, and completed the execution of the sentence in the previous prison on July 11, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

On April 21, 2015, from around 13:20 to 15:40 on the same day, the Defendant was investigated by the police on the first floor of the “D Hospital” located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul, as a assault case on the same day, and then found the victim E, the recipient department staff, and the outpatients and female employees to be the hospital again, and continued to sound against the victim E, the recipient department staff, and the outpatients and female employees, who were in charge of nuclear affairs, and continued to sit back to the sect and the hospital, and went back to the police after receiving 112 report, and interfere with the victim’s receipt and security duties by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Entry of 112 reported case settlement table; and

1. Images of photographs (the face value of a suspect who drinks in a DNA hospital);

1. Previous convictions: Each statement on criminal records and investigation reports (Attachment of judgments, etc. related to the same criminal acts) [The defendant and his defense counsel argued that the defendant and his defense counsel had a little little speech at the level of resistance against violence and forced release and that they did not take any action to the extent that they could interfere with the victim's business, or that they did not engage in any behavior to the extent that they could interfere with the victim's business. Thus, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court are met, namely, the witness E even made an ordinary level of speech and behavior in the investigative agency and this court in the course of requiring the defendant to confirm CCTV, hold a hospital funeral interview, or find his/her own body.

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 2015.10.02 2015노2992

-인천지방법원 2015.05.28 2015고단1483

-청주지방법원 2015.02.06 2014고단1521

-서울남부지방법원 2017.09.08 2017고정91

-인천지방법원 2019.11.21 2019고정1915