The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The following facts are favorable: (a) the Defendant confessions the instant crime against the Defendant at the time of the trial; (b) while the instant crime was committed on the first floor of the hospital, the Defendant was investigated by the police on the same day on the same day; (c) was found to be a hospital; and (d) continued sound against the victim E, the receiving unit staff, and female employees, who were the prime director and employees of the hospital; and (d) continued to sit in a sofri, going to the hospital; and (e) went back to the police station after receiving 112 reports; (c) obstructed the receipt and security service of the victim by force; and (d) obstructed the receipt of the victim’s patients and security services by force; and (e) was not good in light of the background and content of the instant crime; (e) was not subject to criminal punishment for the same kind of crime; and (e) was found to have been subject to criminal punishment once before and after the enforcement of the instant punishment; and (e) was not deemed to have been committed during the period of imprisonment with prison labor of Incheon District Court.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.