Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

In order to prevent infectious diseases, the Minister of Health and Welfare, a Mayor/Do Governor, or the head of a Si/Gun/Gu shall take measures to hospitalize or isolate persons suspected of infectious diseases in appropriate places for a certain period, or take some measures necessary therefor, and no person shall

On August 28, 2020, the Defendant was classified as a contacter with Coina or 19 accurately, and on which on August 28, 2020, a person who, from the head of Suwon-si, makes the isolation period from August 28, 2020 to September 6, 2020, the isolation period from the head of the Gu of Suwon-si as “B apartment C,” and the isolation place as “B apartment C, the isolation area

Nevertheless, from September 11, 2020 to 14:30 on September 5, 2020, the Defendant visited the support room located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the head of Sinwon-si, the head of Sinwon-si, the head of Gu, the head of Gu, the head of Gu, and the head of Gu, the head of Gu, the head of Gu, and the head of Gu, the head

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement of D;

1. Investigative report (Attachment of the notice of isolation - Copy of the notice of isolation); and

1. A certificate of receipt of the quarantine notice;

1. Application of each statute on a written accusation;

1. Article 79-3 subparag. 5, Article 47 subparag. 3, and Article 49 (1) and 14 of the Infectious Disease Control and Prevention Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is a violation of this case even though the defendant was notified of the isolation due to his cona-19, considering the risk of spreading infectious diseases that may cause a violation of the obligation to separate, and the importance of his personal and social efforts to prevent epidemics, the criminal liability of the defendant is not weak.

However, the defendant's acknowledgement of the crime of this case and other records and arguments are shown, such as the frequency and time of the violation of the notification of isolation, time and distance of the escape, the circumstances of the crime, etc.