Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
In order to prevent infectious diseases, the Minister of Health and Welfare, a Mayor/Do Governor, or the head of a Si/Gun/Gu shall take measures to hospitalize or isolate persons who have suffered from infectious diseases in an appropriate place for a certain period, or take some measures necessary therefor, and no person shall comply with such measures.
On September 26, 2020, the Defendant was classified as a contacter with the highest person, and on September 26, 2020, the period of isolation was “from September 26, 2020 to October 12, 2020,” and the place of isolation was isolated by a person who is under the “sib Population B and C” in the port of isolation.
Nevertheless, from September 28, 2020 to 22:50 on September 28, 2020, the Defendant left an isolation place, and driven the Defendant into the Seoul Southern-dong using the Defendant’s Derro-crock cruise car, thereby violating the measures of isolation by a person of the permissible market.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement E in the accused’s legal statement;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing a written accusation, a notice of isolation, and a receipt of isolation notice;
1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases, Articles 79-3 (5) 5 and 49 (1) 14 of the Infectious Disease Control and Prevention Act concerning the crime, and the selection of fines;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment is against the Defendant even though the Defendant was notified of isolation by his coaches or -19. In light of the risk of the spread of contagious diseases and the social cost of the spread of contagious diseases, the liability for the crime is not less complicated.
However, in full view of the fact that the risk of the defendant's violation is not realized, various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments, such as the motive and circumstance of the crime, the frequency of the violation, the timing of the violation, the contacter, and the means of movement, etc., the punishment shall be determined as ordered.