beta
Text
1. The Defendant amounting to KRW 36 million to the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from October 16, 2016 to November 29, 2018.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. Facts 1) C: (a) around 16:44 October 16, 2016, D towing vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant vehicles”)
) A driver of Pyeongtaek-si, driving on the side of the upper parallel of 5.6 km parallel parallel parallel parallel (5.6 km) from the west-do side to the west-to-west side (21-30 km) of the city speed from the west-to-west side to the west-to-west side, and E runs the F Truck (hereinafter “Plaintiff”).
A) While driving a vehicle and driving the vehicle along the three-lanes of the above expressway, the vehicle attempted to enter the road as the side, and the vehicle behind the Defendant vehicle driving on the front side of the road was shocked with the front part of the Plaintiff vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).
2) 2) The instant accident died due to two frameworks, etc.
(hereinafter referred to as “E”. 3) The Plaintiff is the deceased’s children, and the Defendant is the mutual aid business operator for the Defendant’s vehicle. The Defendant is the mutual aid business operator for the Defendant’s vehicle. 【The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries in subparagraphs 1 through 4, Eul’s evidence 2 through 5-27, the images of evidence 1, Eul’s evidence 1, and the purport of the entire pleadings.
B. According to the above facts, as the deceased died due to the operation of the Defendant’s vehicle, the Defendant is liable to compensate the deceased and the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the instant accident as the mutual aid business operator of the Defendant’s vehicle, barring any special circumstances. 2), the Defendant was making a stop on the side in order to confirm the breakdown of the Plaintiff’s vehicle to enter the meter board while sound on the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle, and the Plaintiff’s driver was trying to enter the side of the vehicle in order to pass the vehicle ahead of the vehicle at the point of the accident, such as rapidly changing the vehicle from before the accident and overtaking the vehicle. Thus, the instant accident occurred due to the negligence on the front side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and the driver of the Defendant’s vehicle is this objection.