1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the modification of the contents stated in the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Under the 7th page 4 to 5, “..........., even if the Defendant had the above meal costs liability to the Plaintiff, in light of the fact that the final agreement was reached between the branch of the C hospital and the D hotel’s approval for the use of the said hotel, and the fact that the last agreement was reached after the nearest three months, and the developments leading up to the final agreement, it is reasonable to deem that the final agreement was reached, including the meal costs liability upon the final agreement, “........., even if the agreement was reached, the final agreement was reached, and the last agreement was reached after the near three months, and the last agreement was followed after the lapse of the nearest three months, it is reasonable to deem that the settlement was made including the above 30 million won portion at the time of the final agreement.” On the 10th page 5, the contents of the 10th column “ through 16th column” should be deleted.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.