Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 13, 2016, at around 17:00, the Defendant: (a) notified the establishment and notification of a plan to improve housing redevelopment in the F Area E community center located in Daegu-gu D in the fourth floor; and (b) at the explanation meeting for residents, the Defendant took a bath while avoiding disturbance with the content that does not have any connection with the resident explanation; (c) knife the left shoulder of the victim G (54 years old) who is an employee of an urban maintenance business entity; and (d) knife down the knife of the victim for approximately 14 days so far, the Defendant carried out the knife at the knife at the knife of the victim for about 14 days.

2. On January 21, 2016, the Defendant, at the office of the Housing Redevelopment Promotion Committee for H located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant: (a) went to the meeting room by a victim I (the age of 47) who was an employee of an urban improvement business entity by entering the meeting room and was removed from a disturbance; and (b) brought the victim and the victim with the trial expenses by taking the finger hand of the victim’s finger hand, which is against the Defendant’s bath theory, into the meeting room, and put the victim into the second right 14-day knife damage and salted the second right knife that requires treatment for about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of a witness G, I and J;

1. Part concerning I statement of the second police interrogation protocol against the defendant

1. Each police statement made to G and I;

1. Each complaint filed by G and I;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Photographs of video recording materials;

1. Application of the Act on the Video Recordings

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the claim of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is a legitimate act to protect K in the process of preventing G from intending to take a bath to K and attempting to do so, and even if it does not constitute a justifiable act, it is not likely to be subject to criticism. However, the crime as stated in paragraph (1) of the same Article, which can be known by the evidence above, is committed.