logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2016.04.22 2016고단93
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against assault is dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 12, 2016, around 13:55, the Defendant committed a crime against the victim D at the “F bath” clinic located in Switzerland-si, Switzerland-si, where the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, changed the head to the victim D with the victim of the breath while the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, but the victim was unable to reduce the head of the breath. However, the customer under the influence of alcohol was under the influence of alcohol, “Is the breathy only.”

“Along with the sound and desire,” the sound continued to take a bath for about 20 minutes, and two customers waiting in the air in the outlet were frightened.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's evour business by force.

2. The Defendant committed a crime against the victim G at around 14:10 on the same day, and at around 14:10 on the same day, the Defendant took a voice while continuing to talk with the Defendant without complying with the police officer G, the police officer, the background leading up to the Defendant, I, and the background leading up to the victim, who was called for after receiving a report of 112 that the Defendant avoided the disturbance. The victim asked the personal information of the Defendant, thereby asking the victim for the personal information of the Defendant, and the victim took a photograph of the situation in which the Defendant was

“Along with the victim’s mobile phone, the victim was laid on the floor by cutting off the victim’s cell phone, and the victim’s spawn was inflicted on the victim’s spawn and chest by drinking, resulting in an injury on the victim’s spawn, etc., which requires two-day medical treatment.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers with regard to the dispatch of 112 reported police officers, and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to G or D;

1. Written Statement;

1. 112 A list of reported cases;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business) of the same Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, and Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Code.

arrow