1. The defendant is against the plaintiffs:

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. Of KRW 9,836,443 and the said money, 8,819.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On March 3, 2019, the Plaintiffs leased the real estate listed in the attached list (hereinafter “instant building”) to the Defendant as the lease deposit KRW 30,00,000,000, monthly rent KRW 4,000 (excluding value-added tax), and the lease period from May 31, 2019 to May 30, 202.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). At the time, the lessor agreed to the effect that the lessor may terminate the contract if the amount of the rent in arrears exceeds the three-year rent.

B. On the date of the contract, the Defendant paid KRW 5,00,000 among the above deposit to the Plaintiffs, and the remaining KRW 25,000,000 to the payment on May 31, 2019.

C. While the Defendant did not pay the remaining deposit amount of KRW 25,00,000 to the Plaintiffs, the Defendant received the instant building from the Plaintiffs and operated the bread house.

On August 2019, the Defendant did not pay value-added tax of 400,000 won among the rent of August 2019 to the Plaintiffs, and did not pay the monthly rent from January 2020.

The Defendant did not pay KRW 219,320,00 which was imposed while occupying and using the instant building from December 2, 2019 to March 2020.

E. On February 21, 2020, the Defendant sent text messages to the Plaintiffs that “the closing of a store” was “the closing of a store,” and around that time, the Defendant did not run its business after posting a notice on the opening of the building entrance of this case.

However, it did not report the closure of business and did not report the sales expense such as the table table, and did not notify the plaintiffs of the key to the building of this case.

F. The Plaintiffs expressed their intent to terminate the instant lease agreement by serving the instant complaint on the grounds that the Defendant’s overdue overdue charge reaches three months, and the instant warden served the Defendant on April 14, 2020.

[Ground] Evidence Nos. 1 through 10, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. Determination as to the cause of the claim of this case is lawful by the delivery of the complaint of this case containing the plaintiffs' declaration of termination.