logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2018.07.18 2017가단9091
건물 인도 등
Text

1. The defendant against the plaintiffs

(a) deliver the buildings listed in the separate sheet;

(b) from May 1, 2017, entry in the separate sheet.

Reasons

1. On December 14, 2016, the Plaintiffs to be indicated in the claim leased the buildings listed in the attached list (hereinafter referred to as the “instant building”) to the Defendant with the lease deposit of KRW 20 million, KRW 1320,000 (including value-added tax), and the lease term of KRW 1320,000 (including value-added tax), from January 15, 2017 to January 14, 2019.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement.” The Plaintiffs and the Defendant agreed on the terms and conditions that the Plaintiffs may terminate the instant lease agreement if the amount of the rent in arrears reaches the two-year rent, and the Defendant paid only the rent up to April 30, 2017, and did not pay the remainder until now.

As such, the Plaintiffs expressed their intent to terminate the instant lease agreement by serving a duplicate of the instant complaint on the Defendant, the Defendant should deliver the instant building to the Plaintiffs, and pay rent or unjust enrichment calculated by the ratio of KRW 1320,000 per month from May 1, 2017, which was unpaid to the Plaintiff, to the delivery date of the instant building.

2. Judgment by service (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).

arrow