1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 9, 2012, while transporting steel in the construction site of “Bhouse facility”, the Plaintiff’s hand goes beyond the future, and the Plaintiff’s son’s hand’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son

(6) On June 4, 2015, the medical care was provided to the Review Committee for the determination of disability grade by the date included in the period of medical care due to the relationship between the transportation cost and others being paid as part of the medical care benefits.

B. On May 13, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a claim for disability benefits with the Defendant. After deliberation, the Defendant: (a) deemed that the scope of the exercise was limited to 60 degree with respect to the disability in the left-hand part; (b) thus, the disability grade is determined by class 10 subparag. 13; and (c) determined the disability grade on June 9, 2015 by deeming that the disability in the part of the third part of the part part of the part of the part of the sale, “a person who is suffering from considerable harm to the function of one of the part of the part of the part of the part of the third part of the part of the sale, who is suffering from considerable harm to the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the third part of the sale, falls under “a person who is suffering from a mental therapy due to a mental or physical injury,” and determined

C. On October 5, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for re-issuance of medical care benefits with the Defendant on the ground that the Plaintiff’s symptoms of the “major depression” (hereinafter “the instant injury”). However, the Defendant applied for re-issuance of medical care benefits to the Defendant on the ground that “the Plaintiff was aware of the Plaintiff’s treatment due to the incurable mental disorder, and the symptoms have deteriorated compared to the time of the accident, and thus, the re-issuance of medical care benefits (hereinafter “instant disposition”) was inappropriate.”