logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2013.04.11 2013고단355
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants’ co-principal

A. On June 20, 2012, the Defendants: (a) formed a legal entity in the form of a corporation; (b) opened an account in the name of the said legal entity; (c) opened a mobile phone; and (d) intended to sell to others by opening the mobile phone; and (c) completed the registration of the establishment of Suwon District Court H with the inside director’s “B” and the head office “F (G building) in the Sungnam-si Branch of Sungnam-si, Gyeonggi-do.”

On June 27, 2012, the Defendants filed an application for the establishment of a mobile phone with the employees in charge of the name in the J office of the victim Co., Ltd., in the third floor of Suwon-si I building, as if they were to open and use the mobile phone in the H’s name.

However, in fact, even if you open a mobile phone in the name of the above legal entity, the Defendants, without the actual idea of using the mobile phone, thought to sell it to the name-oriented persons, and even if you open the mobile phone, there was no intention or ability to pay the principal and the telecommunication fee.

Nevertheless, as above, the Defendants deceptioned the staff in charge of the victim J, and received one cell phone equivalent to the market value of 933,900 won from the victim J, which belongs thereto, and received one cell phone equivalent to the market value of 933,900 won from the victim L by the same method at the L office located on the first floor of the 29th of Sung-gu, Jung-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Sungnam, Seoul, Seoul, in the same manner.

7. 25. At the office of Seongdong-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sung-si, one mobile phone equivalent to the market value of 933,000 won was received from the victim M&A in the same way.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to induce each victims to receive the property amounting to 2,800,800 won in total at the market price and acquired it by deceit.

B. Any person violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall be obliged to use and manage the means of access to electronic financing under any other Act.

arrow