Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, with respect to Defendant A, it shall be for 2 years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for one year in the Incheon District Court on July 3, 2013 due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 11, 2013, and is currently under suspended sentence.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around 00:22 on December 26, 2014, the Defendant committed assault, such as assaulting, on the front side of “G” located in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Gyeyang-gu, where the Defendant 112 reported and sent a fight, the police officer affiliated with the Incheon Gyeyang Police Station I box called the “police scambling,” which led the Defendant to the right side of the head of J one time by drinking, and walking twice the buckbbbbbbs.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers regarding the suppression and investigation of crimes, and at the same time, the victimJ (the age of 29) requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

2. On December 26, 2014, at around 00:50, the Defendant committed assault, such as: (a) the defect in the process of the police box of the Incheon Gyeyang Police Station, which was called up upon receiving a request for support at the place specified in the foregoing paragraph (1) and the defect in arresting the Defendant-friendly A as a flagrant offender committing a crime of obstruction of performance of official duties on the grounds of Paragraph (1); (b) the Defendant: (c) obstructed the Defendant’s act; (d) “I will not fluor any fluor; (d) the police fluor; (d) the police fluor; (d) the police fluor; and (e) the fluor; and (d) the head of L with his arms continuously walked three times; and (d) took three times the right fluoring three times the right fluor; and (d) committed assault.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the suppression and investigation of crimes, and at the same time, the Defendant placed a climatic base that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim L(V, 40 years of age).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police officer's statement of J, L, K, and M;

1. Data of the photograph of the damaged female, the 112 Declaration, the diagnostic report;