logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.11.19 2015고정861
폭행등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 08:40 on April 28, 2015, the Defendant assaulted the victim F (the 39 years of age), E, at the crosswalk in front of the D Elementary School located in Si, Mapopo-si, Mapopo-si, in order to have him/her go against, and attempt to be forced to get off, the knife, the knife, the knife, and the knife the knife of the knife, and the knife the knife.

2. At around 16:30 on May 1, 2015, the injured Defendant: (a) as the case in the preceding paragraph from “I” located in Sinpo City H, Mapo-si; (b) had been trying to contact or agree on the part of the victim F; (c) had the cell phone, which had been placed in his/her will, took the cell phone in his/her hand, deducted the victim from his/her hand; and (d) had the victim’s hand hacked with his/her hand, thereby causing an injury to the victim on the right-hand string, which requires approximately one week treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Written statements prepared by the J;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence and the choice of fines) concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant and his defense counsel did not assault the victim as stated in the criminal facts in the judgment of the defendant, and merely did the victim show his/her text message on behalf of another member, while the victim showed another member's text message on behalf of the victim. However, according to the above evidence, the facts of assault as stated in the criminal facts in the judgment of the defendant are acknowledged.

2. The argument on the injury.

arrow