1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On March 9, 1978, the Plaintiff joined the Defendant Company and served as a branch office B from April 1, 201.

B. On November 19, 2003, at the time of the work of the head of C Branch, the Plaintiff received a warning from the Defendant on the grounds of the Defendant’s failure to manage the employees under his control, and received a standby order on December 1, 2006 on the grounds that he did not prevent the embezzlement of the employees under his control. On November 1, 201, at the time of the work of the head of D Branch, he was subject to a reprimand disposition on the grounds that he did not prevent the embezzlement of the employees under his control. On August 18, 2011, at the time of the work of the head of B Branch, the Plaintiff also prepared a explanatory document on the grounds of the failure to manage the employees under his control.

C. On January 4, 2012, when the Plaintiff works for the head of the branch office B, the Plaintiff was subject to a request for disciplinary action by the department in charge of the Defendant Company due to the following reasons: (a) on the grounds of gross negligence on January 4, 2012, the Plaintiff inflicted a loss of KRW 140 million on the company; (b) on the grounds that there was an employee’s notification from the Plaintiff that the Plaintiff had suffered unfair disposal; and (c) on the ground that there was lack of business ability, qualification, quality, and attitude as the head

2. 29. Requests for disciplinary action (one month of salary reduction) was made again on the grounds that the sales commission was not responsible for the management and insolvency of public funds held by its sales commission.

On January 31, 2012 in the process of request for disciplinary action, the Plaintiff was subject to the first standby order (hereinafter referred to as “the first standby order”) issued by the Defendant on March 5, 2012, and was subject to the extension of the first standby order as well as the first standby order on March 5, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as “the second standby order”), and on July 3, 2012 in which the amount of four months thereafter elapsed, the Plaintiff was subject to the second standby order again on July 3, 2012.

hereinafter referred to as "third standby order"

E) On December 31, 2013, the Plaintiff retired from office. The Defendant did not pay bonuses (basic bonuses and performance bonuses) and job allowances during the waiting period, and the Defendant did not pay the net amount of money 25 billion won and the contribution failure to pay for 30 years or longer, which is eligible for the retirement from office. [In the absence of any dispute over grounds for recognition, A 1 through 6, and B].