logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.01.30 2013가합18562
해고무효확인 등
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuits, a standby order issued as of April 9, 2013, a disposition of removal as of July 26, 2013, and a disposition of removal as of December 17, 2013.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a company operating air transport business.

On July 18, 1988, the Plaintiff joined the Defendant and served as a guest room manager via cabin crew.

B. On April 9, 2013, the defendant, around April 2013, issued a standby order and dismissed dispositions, did not indicate specific reasons to the plaintiff on April 8, 2013 and did not indicate the same year.

4. 9. Ordering Magi-dae

(2) On July 26, 2013, the Defendant dismissed the Plaintiff on April 29, 2013 on the ground that “the Plaintiff violated the Company’s regulations, such as the Rules of Employment,” without specifying the specific grounds for disciplinary action and the timing of the occurrence of disciplinary action.”

Although the plaintiff filed for a retrial, the defendant is dismissed on July 2013 and the same year for the plaintiff.

7. notified that he was removed as 26.

(3) On July 26, 2013, the Defendant removed the Plaintiff from office on the ground that he/she revoked the notification of the removal as of July 26, 2013, and the notification of the removal as of December 17, 2013, “the notification of the removal as of July 26, 2013” on December 17, 2013, and at the same time, he/she removed the Plaintiff on the ground that “the Plaintiff removed the Plaintiff from office on the ground that he/she made a sexual harassment, etc. against the Plaintiff on the ground that he/she removed the Plaintiff’s seat class, ID and password, the disclosure of the passenger seat rating, the ID and password, the transfer price of his/her duties, the coercion of gifts using his/her position, and the charges (hereinafter “the removal as of December 17, 2013”).

(4) On July 11, 2014, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff that “the standby order was revoked as of April 9, 2013” was revoked on April 11, 2014, while the Plaintiff filed a request for reexamination.

In addition, the defendant ordered the plaintiff on July 14, 2014 in accordance with Article 4.3. 1 of the Rules of Employment to investigate the plaintiff's misconduct on the same day.

(hereinafter referred to as “a standby Order”) 5.7. 26. 201, the Defendant’s removal from office as of July 26, 2013, the withdrawal of the removal from office as of December 17, 2013, and the removal from office as of July 29, 2014.

arrow