A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 2, 2018, the Defendant destroyed the victim’s property by destroying the front glass window of the victim’s C-owned D vehicle owned by the victim E, destroying the Spain coverr of the victim’s H vehicle owned by G, on the ground that the weather area was sound from the corridor B 307, Daegu-gu B 307, and 2nd floor of the second floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to C, E, and G;

1. Application of the statutes governing a written estimate or photographs of damaged vehicles;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench, taking into account the following: (a) the Defendant’s reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime by committing an act that may cause additional damage without any particular reason; (c) the Defendant’s mistake is divided; (d) the amount of damage is a small amount; and (e) the agreement with the victims, etc.