logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2017.09.19 2017고단780
특수재물손괴
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 10:20 on July 3, 2017, at the police station of Mapo-gu, Busan-si, 17:56-gil-ro, Masan-si, Masan-si, Seoul-si, the Defendant: (b) received money from the Chinese government; and (c) received money of KRW 140 billion from the Chinese government; and (d) made a deduction of money from the Chinese government.

Along with a civil petition consultation with the purport of "... to find the money, it was rejected, and the receipt was made franchising two meters (40cm in total) which are dangerous goods in the Defendant's vehicle, and franchising 920,000 won at the glass market of the victim C-owned car parked in the above police station parking lot, franchising 834,531 won at the glass market of the victim D-owned vehicle, franchising 1,215,34 won at the glass market price of the victim E-owned vehicle, franchising 768,90 won at the glass market price of the victim F-owned vehicle, and franchising 738,775 won at the glass market price of the victim-owned vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and destroyed another's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C, D, E, and F;

1. G statements;

1. Police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Application of internal investigation reports (specific tools for crimes and attaching photographs of seized articles), and application of the Acts and subordinate statutes attached thereto;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 369 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of the recommended sentencing criteria: Imprisonment with prison labor for a period from April to June 10; and

A. Basic crimes and concurrent crimes: Each crime of damaging special property [the scope of recommendations] habitually, repeated crimes, and special damage (Habitual, repeated crimes, special damage, etc.) shall be mitigated ( April to October) (special mitigation person] (special mitigation person] (special mitigation person) and non-members of punishment (special mitigation person).

arrow