logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.12.07 2018고단503
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and two months, for a defendant B, for a period of ten months, for a period of seven months, and for defendant C.

Reasons

Criminal facts

【Defendant A’s criminal records” on July 22, 2016, at the Ulsan District Court, sentenced Defendant A to four years of imprisonment with prison labor for embezzlement, public conflicts, public electronic records, etc., and became final and conclusive on September 30, 2016.

Defendant

A was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud at the Ulsan District Court on December 22, 2016 and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 8, 2017.

Defendant

B On April 27, 2012, the Ulsan District Court sentenced ten months of imprisonment for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act at the Ulsan District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Busan Detention House on August 18, 2012.

[Defendant] The Defendant conspired to use the loan for personal use through the credit guarantee of the Korea Housing Finance Corporation by using a false lease contract, employment certificate, down payment receipt, etc.

1. On June 12, 2014, Defendants A and B entered into a false lease agreement with the following terms: (a) in relation to the “Y Authorized Brokerage Office in Yangsan-si I Apartment-si,” Defendant B’s “Y-si, Yangsan-si,” the term of the lease agreement with the lessor B, the lessee A, the lessee A, the lease deposit of KRW 110,000,000, and the term of the lease, from June 20 to June 19, 2016.”

On June 19, 2014, the Defendants submitted relevant documents, such as a false real estate lease agreement, receipt of down payment, etc., at the victim L Bank Yangsan branch located in K in Yangsan-si, upon filing an application with the employees in charge of loaning KRW 75,00,000 from the National Housing Fund for the loan of KRW 75,00.

However, in fact, the Defendants did not intend to rent the above apartment, and there was no intention to use the above apartment as a deposit for lease.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim bank, and then, they received 75,000,000 won from the victim bank to the M bank account in the name of Defendant B as a loan for lease deposit around June 20, 2014.

2. Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant.

arrow