logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.01.04 2017고단827
건축법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding 12,000,000 (one million two million won).

The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who engages in a building business.

1. The criminal defendant of the crime related to D's detached housing in Nam-si, Namyang-si, a Class-I district unit planning zone located in Nam-si, Namyang-si, located in Namyang-si, on February 12, 2014, obtained permission to construct a single house of 250.32 square meters in total floor area, 2 stories above ground, and 1 households, and obtained approval to use the above building on June 11, 2014.

(a) Where the total floor area of a violation of the Building Act is extended by not more than 85§³, a report shall be filed with the competent authority;

However, on September 2014, the Defendant, without filing a report with the competent authority, installed one partitions of toilets with a size of 72 square meters in the area of the second floor from the above detached house on the second floor on the ground, and extended the multi-structure of steel reinforced concrete structure for residential purposes.

(b) Where a building is to be constructed, altered, or a structure is to be installed in a district unit planning zone in violation of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act, it shall conform to such district unit planning;

However, in order to increase the number of households of one household that does not conform to the E-unit plan stipulated to be constructed at the time and place indicated in the above paragraph 1-A, the defendant stated in the indictment for changing the use of the building as "construction" in the indictment for changing the use of the building by increasing the number of households to four households. However, in light of the progress of the lawsuit, etc., the defendant does not put any substantial disadvantage to the defendant's defense, the defendant shall correct it ex officio.

was made.

(c)

The owner of a facility in violation of the Parking Lot Act or a person responsible for the management of an attached parking lot shall maintain the original function of the attached parking lot so that users of the relevant facility may not interfere with the use of the attached parking lot.

However, the Defendant did not maintain the original function of the attached parking lot without justifiable grounds, by installing a wood farm on the date and time of entry in the above paragraph 1-A, and on the one parking lot installed in the same building at the same place, the size of 15.84 square meters.

2. The facts constituting the crime in relation to the F Single Housing in Southern-si.

arrow