logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.10.17 2018고단6791
유사수신행위의규제에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall agree to pay the full amount of contributions or an amount in excess thereof in the future without obtaining authorization or permission from the authorities, nor shall he/she receive money, etc. from many and unspecified persons for the purpose of making investments, etc.

Nevertheless, on or around March 2, 2017, the Defendant explained to the effect that “E is an institution specialized in sports betting, which has its head office in Brazil, and may make high profits through a stable competition or sports trading. If it invests KRW 3,00,000 per unit, it shall be paid a total of USD 170 per share of USD 52 per share of USD 9,360,000 per share of KRW 170 per annum (limited to USD 180,000 per share) and can make profits equivalent to KRW 310% per annum, and the principal may be paid within 3-4 months as investments from the same day.” In addition, from January 4, 2017, the Defendant received KRW 21,000,000 per share of KRW 3,00 per share of KRW 52 weeks.

5. Until September 19, 199, 34 people received total sum of KRW 654,250,000 from 34 people in the same manner as indicated in the attached list of crimes and received them in total on 59 occasions as investments.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. The witness D's legal statement, each of the witness F and G's legal statement;

1. Statement made by a witness H in the second trial records;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused and I;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts to the effect that each copy of each passbook, each application for registration with each radar, each investigation report, each statement of transactions, each statement of transactions, each transaction statement, Internet contents, certificates of Internet contents, deposit with no passbook, J advertising output, copy of a copy of a passbook, the defendant and his defense counsel did not engage in any act of receiving money without permission, and provided technical assistance to other investors by guaranteeing the principal amount.

However, according to the above evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court.

arrow