logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.12.17 2018고단2788
유사수신행위의규제에관한법률위반
Text

1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for two years;

Seized evidence Nos. 1 through 3 shall be confiscated from Defendant A.

2...

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No one who commits a joint crime by the Defendants shall agree to pay the full amount of contributions or an amount in excess thereof in the future without obtaining authorization, permission, etc. from the competent authority, and receive the contributions;

Nevertheless, the Defendants, at around August 2016, at the D Office of Defendant A’s operation of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City Ctel 8, Defendant A, a similar recipient company, had the role of registering and publicizing its members in Korea as a domestic business entity No. D 1, a similar recipient company, and Defendant B agreed to pay an amount exceeding the amount of investment to an unspecified number of unspecified persons after soliciting investors in Busan and managing its membership registration.

In addition, the Defendants, around August 2016, against many unspecified victims, “D is an institution specialized in the sports betting, which has its head office in BD, and raising high profits through a stable competition investment or sports trading. If an investment of KRW 3 million per unit is made by means of a system that conducts real-time sports betting, such as stock trading, Moble or PC, the Defendants may receive profits equivalent to KRW 200,000 per annum 52 weeks per 330% per annum. In order to join as a member, the Defendants purchased bitcos equivalent to USD 2046 and sent them to Bloro head office. In addition, if the lower investors are paid KRW 170 per 1 person’s recommendation allowance (U.S.) in addition to the agreed dividends, and if the lower investors are constantly formed, the amount of KRW 136,000 per 1.6 million per month is additionally paid from G 1360,000 per month.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to receive similar acts.

2. Defendant A’s joint criminal act with H around November 201, 201, along with H (1).

arrow