The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the fact-finding) did not assault the victims, and rather did so by the victims.

2. The evidence duly admitted by the lower court and the record reveal the following circumstances, namely, the victim D consistently asserts that the victim was injured on October 9, 201 by taking face face and suffered bodily injury. Although D has consistently stated that it would have been faced with knee due to the head of the victim, it would be unclear whether D would have been faced with knee due to the 10th case, but at the time of the investigation, D would have been in drinking alcohol; when the victim was investigated before November, it would have been exposed to the face of the victim; the victim F would have been confused with the victim on October 9, 201; and the victim F would have been aware of the fact that the Defendant did not appear to have suffered bodily injury beyond 10D, and the Defendant did not appear to have made a mistake of facts in light of the consistent investigation agency and the fact that the Defendant did not appear to have suffered bodily injury beyond 10D, and thus, the Defendant did not appear to have made any other statement by the lower court.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.