A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 13, 2003, when the Seoul Central District Court designated a public document as a fraud, the Defendant was anticipated to use the document by altering the term of validity of the passport on November 1, 2004, when the validity term of the Defendant’s passport ( Passport Number C) was terminated on November 1, 2004, while he was staying in China around August 13, 2003.

On September 28, 2004, the defendant paid approximately 12 million Chinese currency to the person who was named as a Bromoer for the forgery and alteration of a passport (a approximately 200,000 won) and requested the alteration of the passport, and issued the passport to the person who was named above, and the person who was named above, affixed the seal of E to the name of E without authority, stating that the term of validity of this passport is "OCT 31209 extension, Per mitD, DNA SP 28204, and division E," without authority, for the extension column of the passport for six pages of the passport issued by the defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant modified the defendant's passport in the name of the Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade, which is an official document, for the purpose of exercising his name in collusion.

2. On February 2, 2005, the defendant presented the altered passport as stated in Paragraph 1 above to obtain a visa with the validity period of three months of local stay in China in China, and exercised it by means of issuing Chinese visa until May 22, 2005, when the validity period was presented to the person in charge of non-personal issuance who knows that it was actually formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to request an investigation of the criminal's written statement, report on the arrival of internal investigation and the use of the forged passport;

1. Articles 225, 229, and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. The scope of the recommended sentencing guidelines [the scope of the recommended sentencing] official documents, etc.