Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for two years.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a BMW car.

On July 10, 2018, the Defendant driven the above car at around 12:50, and driven the D Airport International Airport Line C at a speed of 40km per hour prior to the departure of the D Airport International Airport Line C, along two-lanes from the bank at the entrance of the D Airport to the exit of the second-story International Airport.

At all times, taxi or vehicle parked in order to get passengers get off in the future of the departure of the D International Airport from the Republic of Korea is at the speed of 40 km a speed of booming down at 40 km a speed. In such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle by observing the speed of restriction and by checking well the right and the right and the right of the vehicle.

Although the Defendant was working at an airline with an office in D Airport and was well aware of such road situation, the Defendant, in violation of the above duty of care, proceeded with roads with a speed of 40 km or more at a speed of 131 km or more at a speed exceeding 20 km or speed of 40 km or more, without accurately operating the steering gear and operating the said vehicle at a speed of 131 km or negligence before the departure of the said International Airport No. 1, the Defendant tried to remove passengers before the departure of the said International Airport and find out and avoid the Victim F (the remaining, 46 years old), which was late behind the Eststst, and was trying to stop at a speed of 93.9 km or at a speed not belonging to the said victim and the said taxi back part of the said taxi with a speed of 40 km or more, and had the victim left while driving the said taxi.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim G by occupational negligence to suffer approximately two weeks of tensions and tensions, and the victim F is not aware of the number of days of treatment. In short, it is not clear that the victim F would have damaged the ebrates and vertebrate so that it could not be known to the victim F.