A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

Criminal power is sentenced to a fine of 2.5 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in Changwon District Court's assistance on February 21, 2008, and a fine of 2.5 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the same court on December 12, 2012, and two years for a suspended sentence of 6 months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, respectively, in the same court on December 21, 2012, which became final and conclusive on December 21, 2012.

Criminal facts

1. On April 12, 2013, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collective assaulting with a deadly weapon, etc.) (hereinafter referred to as “victim”) by misunderstanding the victim E (the aged 25) that the Defendant drinking alcohol at the D main point located in C when smuggling and drinking alcohol at the right side of the victim E (the aged 25) without paying the drinking value, and putting a dangerous object in mind, thereby making up for the part of the victim’s left part on the road in front of the F in C when smuggling.

Accordingly, the defendant, carrying a protected object, and assaulted the victim.

2. The defendant is a person engaged in driving a G cruise car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, violation of the Road Traffic Act, violation of the Road Traffic Act, and violation of the Road Traffic Act;

On May 13, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol at 0.228% without obtaining a driver’s license on May 13, 2013, and driven the road in front of the new cryp to the upper right side of the upper right side of the cryp, while driving it in the influence of alcohol at 0.28%.

Since there are a lot of vehicles parked around the city and there are no median lines, the defendant engaged in driving of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to prevent accidents by reducing speed and driving it in good manner.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to drive normally due to the above influence of drinking, and proceeds as it is, and is against the direction of the defendant's proceeding.