logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.08.23 2013고합189
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복협박등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 20:00 on June 30, 2013, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of 0.145% of blood alcohol concentration on the roads front of the D cafeteria located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (b) was under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.145%; (c) was in contact with the above cafeteria which was parked behind the said cafeteria; (d) accordingly, the Defendant was placed in contact with the above cafeteria, which was parked behind the said cafeteria; (c) was placed on the wind reported by the above cafeteria, and was notified that the driver’s license was revoked by the police officer, and (d) the above cafeteria was able to be taken a cafeteria as a fluoring test.

1. Around 21:50 on June 30, 2013, the Defendant, in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Intimidation, etc.) and the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (collectively weapons, etc.) cited two parts, which are dangerous articles to the said D cafeteria (15cm in length), and expressed the victim F (58 years in length), who is an employee of the said cafeteria, expressed his desire to “whether any she reported to the police,” and put the victim under the same attitude that would harm the life or body of the victim.

As above, the Defendant carried dangerous objects with the intent of retaliation and threatened the victim.

2. Violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (a collective action, deadly weapons, etc., damage, etc.) led the Defendant to tear by affixing two water boxes at the time, place, and at the same place as stated in paragraph (1) of this Article, which are dangerous objects, where the market price of the victim G cannot be known. The Defendant, who was parked in front of the restaurant, led the Defendant to teared the 120,000 won of the repair cost.

The Defendant carried dangerous articles as above and damaged the victims’ property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning the F;

1.The police of F. F.

arrow