The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal is that the contractor H agreed to pay wages directly to the workers of this case, and the workers of this case have consented thereto. As such, the Defendant is not liable to pay wages to the workers of this case, or even if he is responsible, the intent of violation of the Labor Standards Act cannot be acknowledged.

2. The court below's decision and the evidence adopted and examined by the court below and the court below's decision and the following circumstances recognized as follows. ① The defendant, upon being awarded a contract for the instant work falling under the wooden hole among the hotel remodeling works of this case from the contractor He, was responsible for the field director's work on July 31, 2012. The construction work of this case was completed around December 2012 and around January 2013, H appears to have paid the construction work cost of this case to the defendant, who was employed by the contractor, for more than KRW 90,000,000 (including value-added tax) for several times until the end of January 2013 at the defendant's request, and ② the defendant, upon being employed and supervised several parts of the orderer's work of this case from the contractor, had been employed from the contractor's 1 to 215,000,0000,0000 from the contractor's work cost of this case.

It is rather difficult to say that the defendant is no longer responsible for paying wages to the people or the defendant.