1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is the owner of the new construction of the second-story housing unit C in the Jeonbuk-gun, Jeonbuk-gun (hereinafter “instant construction”).

B. On April 27, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) felled on the wind, and sustained injuries, such as the epiculation of the ejaculation, while performing the Home Correctional Work on the second floor’s outer wall at the construction site; and (b) sustained injuries, such as the ejaculation of the ejaculation.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. 1) In the case of the Plaintiff’s alleged construction contract, the contractor does not have a duty to take safety measures necessary to prevent accidents in connection with the contractor’s work. However, in special circumstances such as where the contractor specifically instructed and supervised the contractor’s work or individual work, the contractor has a duty to take safety measures necessary to prevent accidents in connection with the contractor’s work. The Defendant, as the contractor, has a duty to take safety measures in relation to the contractor’s work. Nevertheless, as the Defendant failed to perform this, 85,537,083 won (i.e., lost profit 59,537,083 won) suffered by the Plaintiff (i.e., KRW 26 million). 2), there is no evidence to acknowledge that the Defendant did not specifically instruct or supervise the work of this case or individual work of the contractor, and rather, the Defendant did not use the Plaintiff’s work in the direction of safety measures in relation to the manufacturer’s work, and the Plaintiff did not use it in the manner of the supervisor’s testimony and supervision.